EDITORIALE: LA VITA MESSA ALLA PROVA/EDITORIAL: LIFE PUT TO TEST

Abstract

Abstract

In this article we present some studies that, in the wake of the Critical Evaluation Studies approach, deepen the deconstruction of “neo-evaluation” devices and analyze the consequences of their application to different professional contexts, e.g., in schools, universities, social and health services, and inclusion policies for people with disabilities. We argue that evaluation practices not only do not improve the professional performances in these areas, but also lead to the loss of autonomy, intrinsec motivation and freedom to act. As a result of this process, the space of “professionalism” is increasingly invaded and colonized by the logic of the market and managerialism. Finally, the symbolic violence of evaluation practices is emphasized. Evaluation enacts a “force” that governs conduct, but it does so by presenting itself as “form”. In this way, it allows force to be exerted without even being recognized as force, so that force ends up taking the objective, acceptable and convincing form of quality.

Keywords

Critical Evaluation Studies; Professionalism; Meritocracy.